Sponsor |  davidfm | Apr 30, 2006 11:09am | I know it's against the principles of most of us, me imcluded, but shouldn't the atheist meet, organize themselves, be more visible? I mean, for most of the 20th century it was relatively easy to be an atheist in Western countries, but things are changing fast.
It's sort of a jove question (but only sort of). |
|
|
Sponsor | | Vortexfugue | Apr 30, 2006 11:30am | | Sure... but let's not call it a church. |
|
|
Sponsor | | davidfm | Apr 30, 2006 8:24pm | | How would we call it? how would we organize it? I guess we won't use a Pope. |
|
|
Sponsor | |
|
Sponsor | | IrishYankee | Apr 30, 2006 9:08pm | | happy hour at molly branigans, this friday, in harrisburg, pa, i will buy the first round! ???? that would make me happy to call it a church, a party, a 'HeyZeus' free zone, whatever.. but, i would most definetely buy the first round! |
|
|
|  jgweissman | May 1, 2006 3:27pm | Call it a foxhole, or a storm, or some other place where there are supposedly no athiests.
A "storm of athiests" sounds good to me. |
|
|
Sponsor | | Vortexfugue | May 1, 2006 3:58pm | | How about a "deathbed of atheists"? |
|
|
| | Benicek | May 29, 2006 1:27am | | Surely the various national Humanist organisations that exist are essentially atheist churches. |
|
|
Sponsor | | Coffee | May 29, 2006 8:12am | | Whatever happened to individuality? |
|
|
| | Benicek | May 29, 2006 8:35am | | Individuality is just a myth. It's what we have in common with other people that counts. Even an original work of art is meaningless unless someone else likes it. |
|
|
|
Atheists → Discussion